🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising group of countries are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to approve a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged guardians to prevent their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these services, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age limit is a useful foundation," commented the MEP behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive data".

Last year, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. However, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to harmful platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the local level amid federal inaction.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional access requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills requiring guardian approval for under-16s to open social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to mimic this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Beyond these regions, additional nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

As this international debate continues, the policies of Australia and its followers indicate that governments internationally are less and less prepared to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.